The article from The New Yorker reflects on the challenges Democratic candidates face in connecting with women voters, particularly in the context of the upcoming 2024 election. It contrasts personal memories of the author's mother, a secretive voter who remained independent in her political choices, with current Democratic messaging that seems condescending and simplistic. The author argues that while Democratic strategies heavily focus on abortion rights as the mobilizing factor for women voters, they fail to acknowledge the complexities of women's voting behaviors, which are influenced by a range of issues beyond reproductive rights. The article concludes that both parties have historically patronized women, and that current Democratic tactics may not resonate effectively with all demographics, especially those with different socioeconomic backgrounds.

Key Points:

• The article uses the author's childhood memories of election nights to explore how women's voting behaviors are shaped by personal experiences and societal expectations.
• It critiques Democratic messaging for being condescending, treating women voters as in need of guidance rather than addressing their diverse concerns.
• The author discusses the historical voting patterns of women, indicating a shift toward Democrats in recent decades, particularly around issues like abortion.
• The piece highlights the contradiction within voter demographics, showing that many women who support abortion rights still voted for Trump.
• The ongoing debate around reproductive rights and the implications of the Dobbs decision are framed as urgent public health issues.
• Ultimately, the article suggests that both political parties must move away from simplistic narratives and better understand and engage with women's experiences and viewpoints.
  Link to Article