Welcome to today’s episode. A recent study sheds light on the limitations of simulated reasoning AI models. These models can effectively solve routine math problems but struggle with deeper challenges like competition-level proofs.

Despite their marketing, researchers from ETH Zurich and INSAIT found that, on average, these models scored below 5% on mathematical proofs from the 2025 US Math Olympiad. Ivo Petrov and his team noted, "The U.S. Math Olympiad presents a much higher bar... requiring complete mathematical proofs."

While Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro performed best, scoring 24%, the results starkly contrasted with lower-level benchmarks. Most models failed significantly, highlighting a performance gap between math answering and reasoning. As the study states, “Current SR models function well at tasks where similar patterns appear... but lack the deeper 'conceptual understanding' required for proof-based mathematics.”

In essence, while these AI models can mimic mathematical reasoning in a limited scope, they often produce flawed solutions with a false sense of certainty. This research serves as a reminder of the challenges ahead in developing AI that truly understands complex reasoning. Stay tuned for more insights on AI advancements!
Link to Article