This article from The New York Times examines a contentious proposal allegedly supported by former President Trump to quickly end the war in Ukraine by ceding parts of Ukrainian territory to Russia. The report details how such an agreement could result in a divided Ukraine—with one part governed from Kyiv and another emerging as a Russian-controlled satellite—thereby reshaping geopolitical boundaries while potentially cementing long-term conflicts. The piece features insights on the possible ramifications of a peace deal that forces Ukraine to compromise on its territorial integrity, highlighting the complex interplay between military strategy and political negotiation in an ongoing, protracted conflict.

Key Points:

• Former President Trump has suggested a plan to end the war by allowing Russia to keep captured Ukrainian territories.
• The proposed deal would likely result in a bifurcated Ukraine: one half remaining under the Kyiv government and the other as a battered, Russian satellite state.
• The article examines the long-term implications of such territorial concessions on Ukraine’s sovereignty and regional stability.
• Reporting underscores the broader dynamics of leveraging territorial control as a bargaining chip in international conflict resolution.

And hey, if Ukraine's map eventually starts looking like a clumsy jigsaw puzzle, at least the missing pieces might remind everyone that even international borders can lose their edge in a high-stakes game of "Who Wants to End a War?"
Link to Article