Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been making bold claims about how it's optimizing government spending, but recent efforts to limit transparency have raised eyebrows. According to a White House official, these new restrictions are for "security purposes," but The New York Times investigative team still uncovered significant errors in DOGE's reports. From inflated savings figures to misrepresented project outcomes, the report paints a picture of a system that lacks oversight. As scrutiny grows, the question remains: Is DOGE truly improving efficiency, or is it just spinning numbers to fit a predetermined narrative?

Key Points:

• Elon Musk’s DOGE has restricted access to its data, citing "security purposes," making verification harder.
• The New York Times investigative team still found major errors in DOGE’s reports.
• Errors include overstated cost savings and misrepresented project outcomes.
• Past news reports have already called out DOGE’s inaccuracies, prompting the new transparency restrictions.
• Critics argue that DOGE is more about public relations than actual efficiency improvements.
• The investigation raises concerns about the lack of independent oversight in DOGE’s operations.

It looks like Musk’s push for government efficiency might not be as effective as claimed. The key question is: Are these mistakes due to poor reporting, or is DOGE deliberately misleading the public?
Link to Article