In this New York Times article, the author delves into how Elon Musk’s upbringing as a privileged white South African during apartheid has profoundly shaped his worldview and current actions. Rather than simply a self-made genius, Musk is portrayed as a figure whose ideology reflects the hierarchical, exclusionary values of his past, influencing everything from his controversial interventions in American politics to his stance on South Africa's land reform. The piece argues that Musk’s behavior—whether firing federal employees, engaging in high-level White House discussions, or advocating for white South African interests—mirrors the enduring legacy of apartheid, suggesting that even as settler rule has officially ended, its attitudes persist in figures like him. As the article puts it, it raises the question, "What happens when settler rule fails but settlers remain?" while also linking his approach to that of other Southern African expatriates in Silicon Valley, such as Peter Thiel and David Sacks.

Key Points:

• Musk’s background as a white South African elite under apartheid is central to understanding his contentious political and business practices.
• His recent political moves include firing federal employees, making frequent high-profile White House appearances, and aligning with controversial figures and policies.
• The article highlights his intervention in South Africa’s land reform debate, where he suggests that white South Africans face unique persecution.
• Musk’s ideology is characterized by strong support for deregulated markets, resistance to labor organizing, and a brand of nationalism often compared to Trumpism.
• His approach is seen as a modern replication of apartheid’s economic principles—maintaining privileged zones under the guise of “free enterprise.”
• The analysis connects Musk with other influential Southern African expatriates like Peter Thiel and David Sacks, who similarly channel a historical legacy of hierarchical thinking.
• Direct Quote: “What happens when settler rule fails but settlers remain?”

This summary captures the essence of the article in an engaging way, perfect for a podcast episode on the intersections of power, politics, and legacy in modern society.
Link to Article