In this lively New York Times conversation, Bret Stephens and Gail Collins trade witty remarks about President Trump's insistence on declaring English as the official language—a proposal they both see as more of a political gimmick than a solution to any real problem. The discussion, peppered with humorous language anecdotes and cross-lingual banter, reveals how Trump’s stance is being used as a political hook, with Bret provocatively suggesting that "Democrats should insist on making English the official language and then demand that Trump learn to speak and write it properly." The duo explores the absurdity of forcing a single language as a marker of national identity while underscoring that many countries successfully embrace their official tongues without compromising freedom and democracy. They also briefly touch on Trump’s recent speech to Congress, framing it as another spectacle in his political playbook.

Key Points:

• Bret Stephens and Gail Collins engage in a spirited discussion about Trump’s push for declaring English as the official language.
• The pair use humor and linguistic anecdotes—such as Gail’s failed attempts at learning Spanish and Russian—to highlight the absurdity of enforcing linguistic uniformity.
• They criticize Trump's proposal as a “loopy and nasty Trump appeal to the throngs,” suggesting it is more about political spectacle than addressing genuine issues.
• Bret notes that many nations have official languages (French, Spanish, Danish, Swedish) without compromising democratic principles, and that this shift should not be used as political bait.
• The conversation also briefly references Trump’s recent speech to Congress, implying it is part of his strategy to create political distractions.

This playful yet insightful dialogue ultimately leaves listeners pondering the role of language policies in political maneuvering. Enjoy the episode!
Link to Article