The article discusses the potential economic impact of President-elect Donald Trump's proposed tariffs on imports, particularly those targeting China. Trump's plans to implement tariffs as high as 60% could lead to significant inflation, raising consumer prices by up to 5.1% and potentially triggering inflation rates between 6% and 9.3% when paired with other proposals. The article examines whether the Supreme Court will uphold Trump's tariffs, noting the broad powers awarded to the executive for tariff imposition under federal laws, despite past judicial opposition to analogous executive actions. The analysis outlines possible legal challenges based on the major questions doctrine, the mixed precedent of previous presidential tariff proclamations, and the implications of supporting or opposing such economic policies in the context of party politics.

Key Points:

• Trump's proposed tariffs could raise consumer prices by up to 5.1% and diminish economic growth by 1.4%.
• Inflation due to these tariffs could reach between 6% and 9.3% alongside other policies.
• The Supreme Court’s position on tariffs remains uncertain, facing pressures from both legal precedents and political implications.
• Federal laws grant the president significant power to impose tariffs, with vague provisions limiting judicial oversight.
• The "major questions doctrine" may constrain Trump’s tariffs, but it has only been applied against Biden-era policies so far.
• The outcome of potential legal challenges could either empower or limit executive authority, with economic consequences for the public.
  Link to Article