In this thought-provoking New York Times opinion piece, Elon Musk's relentless work ethic is scrutinized as both a badge of honor and a potential liability. Despite being the world’s richest man, Musk endorses grueling 80- to 120-hour work weeks and even resorts to sleeping on office floors to get the job done, branding this sacrifice as a "superpower." The article delves into how Musk’s extreme approach—originating from a deeply entrenched American valorization of unyielding productivity—has not only shaped his own ventures but is now being funneled into government operations. By replacing experienced officials with his so-called DOGE shock troops and leaning heavily on automation, Musk’s blueprint for success is losing sight of practical governance in favor of an almost monarchical cult of hard work. His methods, which include firing half of Twitter's workforce and a reliance on “a steady stream of delivery pizzas, Red Bull and Doritos,” serve as a stark counterpoint to the traditional checks and balances of effective management.

Key Points:

• Extreme Work Ethic: Musk promotes working 80 to 120 hours a week, famously stating, "Working the weekend is a superpower."
• Government Overhaul: He is applying his aggressive management style to government functions by replacing seasoned bureaucrats with tech and machine learning solutions, referred to as DOGE shock troops.
• Corporate Parallels: The article draws parallels between Musk’s practices and those of other tech giants like Jeff Bezos and Tim Cook, underscoring the deep-seated belief that endless work equates to ultimate success.
• Historical Context: It traces the ideological roots of this work-centric mentality to early 20th-century economists like Joseph Schumpeter, who celebrated the fearless, dominant entrepreneur.
• Controversial Outcomes: Despite the boastful claims of unparalleled productivity, Musk’s approach has led to significant missteps, including major errors in cost reporting and critical staffing mishaps in areas as sensitive as nuclear weapons safety.
• Cultural Reflection: The piece questions whether the celebration of ceaseless labor might be more about self-aggrandizement than genuine progress, reflecting broader concerns about the direction of American corporate and governmental leadership.

This summary paints the picture of a world where extreme work habits not only define leadership in business but are also ambitiously (and perhaps recklessly) transplanted into government, raising important questions about efficiency, accountability, and the future of public administration.
Link to Article