The article examines the potential impact of Donald Trump's second term on U.S. foreign aid, contrasting it with his first term. During Trump's initial presidency, despite proposals for significant cuts to foreign aid programs, bipartisan support in Congress effectively maintained funding levels. Key figures highlighted in the article, including congressional leaders, demonstrated a commitment to global health funding, encouraging higher allocations than Trump's requests. However, uncertainty surrounds Trump's upcoming term, marked by a shift towards skepticism of multilateral health organizations and the potential influence of figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., known for anti-vaccine advocacy. The article raises concerns about the possibility of cuts to critical vaccination programs and the revival of presidential budgetary powers that could undermine congressional authority over foreign aid allocations.

Key Points:

• Trump and his administration showed skepticism towards foreign aid during his campaign.
• His first term saw budget proposals for significant cuts, but Congress upheld foreign aid levels.
• Bipartisan Congressional support was crucial in preserving funding for global health initiatives.
• Trump's second term may diverge significantly from the first, especially regarding multilateral health organizations.
• The potential influence of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. raises concerns about funding for vaccination programs.
• A revival of presidential powers could threaten the traditional congressional role in foreign aid appropriation.
  Link to Article