The article discusses a new approach to tackling misinformation called the "bypassing technique." Instead of directly confronting false claims with counter-evidence, which often proves ineffective, the bypassing technique promotes introducing positive and factual information that reframes the discussion. This technique has been shown to improve attitudes toward controversial subjects without directly addressing the misinformation. For example, when someone claims that GMOs cause allergies, instead of correcting them, one could highlight the benefits of GMOs for global food security. The research indicated that while bypassing may not change deeply held beliefs, it can successfully promote acceptance of controversial topics and encourage a more open discussion.

Key Points:

• Bypassing technique is an alternative to correcting misinformation by providing positive counterclaims.
• Traditional methods of fact-correction are often ineffective in changing attitudes.
• Bypassing involves reframing the conversation with factual benefits rather than attacking false claims.
• Research showed that bypassing effectively improved acceptance towards controversial topics like GMOs and 5G technology.
• Bypassing may not change beliefs but can influence policy acceptance and willingness to consider new information.
• The technique is likened to "epistemological aikido," where the focus is on redirecting the conversation.
  Link to Article