· 03:35
Here’s a podcast-style summary and key points for the Ars Technica article titled “What could possibly go wrong? DOGE to rapidly rebuild Social Security codebase”:
🎙️ Podcast Summary:
Ready for a high-stakes tech gamble with your grandma’s retirement check? The U.S. government has tasked the ironically-named Department of Government Efficiency—DOGE—to pull off a jaw-dropping migration of the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) aging codebase from 60-million-plus lines of COBOL to a modern language like Java… in just a few months. Yes, a task experts estimated would take years is now being fast-tracked under Elon Musk associate Steve Davis. Critics are sounding serious alarms, with fears ranging from benefit payment disruptions to invisible errors that could leave recipients hanging. The teetering plan follows recent allegations by Trump and Musk that the SSA is plagued with fraud, including the bizarre claim—debunked—that Americans aged 150 are still cashing payments. With legacy systems dating back to the 1980s and a mountain of delicate logic under the hood, rushing this overhaul could spell disaster for tens of millions of vulnerable Americans.
📝 Key Points:
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), created under the Trump administration, is planning to rapidly replace the SSA's massive COBOL-based system with Java or a similar "modern" language in just a few months.
COBOL, developed in the 1950s and used widely in government and financial institutions, still forms the backbone of SSA's infrastructure—over 60 million lines of COBOL code support critical tasks such as issuing Social Security numbers and processing payments.
The fast-tracked migration is being led by Steve Davis, a close associate of Elon Musk, raising eyebrows among tech professionals and bureaucrats alike.
Experts warn rushing this project could lead to catastrophic errors, including the risk of millions not receiving benefits or receiving incorrect entitlements. One SSA technologist said: “The invisible errors and omissions” are the most worrying.
The SSA previously launched a similar modernization effort in 2017, which was projected to take over five years. That plan was shelved due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The SSA has faced harsh criticism from officials like Musk, who falsely claimed that centenarians—some as old as 150—were still receiving benefits, a statement the data does not support.
Recent DOJ and DOGE-led budget cuts have already destabilized the SSA’s operations, leading to website outages and long phone wait times.
Internal SSA documents mention ongoing priorities like cutting "non-essential contracts" and implementing AI for admin tasks—but there is no formal mention yet of the COBOL migration timeline.
⚠️ Experts interviewed, including Dan Hon of Very Little Gravitas, suggest this timeline is unrealistic: "If you weren't worried about a whole bunch of people not getting benefits or getting the wrong benefits... then sure, go ahead."
📚 Historical Context:
COBOL was once promoted by the U.S. Department of Defense to ensure industry standardization, and has powered countless mainframe systems for decades.
Despite being seen as outdated, COBOL systems are extremely stable and reliable—migrating off them remains one of the riskiest moves in enterprise tech.
🔍 Additional Insight:
This story aligns with a broader trend of politically motivated tech policy moves that underplay the complexities of legacy system modernization. Similar rushed projects in other agencies (like the UK’s Universal Credit system) have shown that speed sacrifices quality and often ends up costing more in the long term.
Stay tuned—this one could affect everyone from your neighbor to your nana.
Link to Article
Listen to jawbreaker.io using one of many popular podcasting apps or directories.